United States v. Pierce
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
479 F.3d 546 (2007)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
William and Shirley Pierce (defendants) managed a not-for-profit charter school, Right Step Academy. Right Step Academy was funded by both the State of Minnesota and the federal government (plaintiff). The Pierces committed misconduct relating to the operation of the school. The Pierces engaged in self-dealing with an entity that they controlled called Right Group. The Pierces defrauded both Minnesota and the federal government by diverting funds from the school for personal use. The Pierces failed to claim the diverted funds on their tax returns and stated personal expenses as business expenses. Additionally, the Pierces failed to operate the school pursuant to the school’s charter agreement. After over four years of mismanagement and fraud, the Pierces were charged with and tried for conspiracy, filing false tax returns, mail fraud, and wire fraud. The trial court instructed the jury on Pinkerton liability, or vicarious liability of coconspirators. In its jury instruction, the court provided that if the jury finds the defendant guilty of conspiracy and a fellow conspirator committed one of the other charged offenses in furtherance of and as a foreseeable consequence of the conspiracy, then the jury “should find” the defendant guilty of that offense as well. The jury convicted the Pierces on all counts. The Pierces appealed, arguing that the jury instruction on Pinkerton liability ought to have used permissive language (i.e., may) instead of mandatory language (i.e., should).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nangle, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.