United States v. Schap
United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals
44 M.J. 512 (1996)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Sergeant Stephen J. Schap (defendant) was visiting his wife in the hospital when she revealed to him that she was pregnant due to an extramarital affair. Schap remained calm and stayed at the hospital with his wife for several minutes, apparently concerned about her condition. Schap then went home and packed his passport, clothing, toiletries, food, financial records, and money. At some point, Schap also retrieved his eight-inch fighting knife. Over the next hour, Schap methodically deduced that his wife’s lover was Specialist Glover, one of Schap’s friends. After Schap located Glover at a phone booth next to the barracks dining hall, he attacked Glover with the knife, ultimately decapitating him. Witnesses described several of Schap’s actions as slow and rhythmic. Schap then held up Glover’s severed head and calmly announced, “This is what happens when you commit adultery.” After returning to his car, Schap changed clothes, placed Glover’s head into an athletic bag, and returned to his wife’s hospital room, where he screamed at his wife and thrust Glover’s head toward her before placing the head on her bedside table. Schap then calmly explained his actions to doctors and police. A general court-martial found Schap guilty of premeditated murder. Schap appealed, arguing that he should have been convicted of voluntary manslaughter and not premeditated murder because he had killed Glover in the heat of a sudden passion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Johnston, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.