United States v. Slatten
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
865 F.3d 767 (2017)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Nicholas Slatten (defendant) worked for Blackwater Worldwide Security providing security for the United States State Department in Iraq. In 2007, Blackwater contractors were involved in shootings in Baghdad’s Nisur Square that killed or injured many Iraqi civilians. Hours after the shootings, State Department investigators spoke with one of Slatten’s teammates. The investigators told Slatten’s teammate that if he was honest, nothing he said would be used against him. Slatten’s teammate told the investigators that he shot the driver of a white Kia sedan. The teammate repeated his claims two more times, always under promise of immunity. Accounts from two Iraqi police officers and other Blackwater contractors corroborated Slatten’s teammate’s statements. Nevertheless, the United States (plaintiff) asserted that it was Slatten who shot the Kia’s driver and charged Slatten with first-degree murder. His teammate and two other Blackwater contractors (defendants) were charged with manslaughter. Before trial, Slatten asked to be tried separately because he wanted to introduce his teammate’s statements to the investigators as exculpatory evidence, and those statements would not be admissible in a joint trial with his teammate. The district court denied Slatten’s request after finding that the statements were inadmissible hearsay. Slatten was convicted of murder, and he appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.