United States v. Wade

577 F. Supp 1326 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Wade

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
577 F. Supp 1326 (1983)

  • Written by Tanya Munson, JD

Facts

A Chester, Pennsylvania dump site owned by Melvin Wade (defendant) had become contaminated by hazardous wastes. The United States (plaintiff) sued the property owners and others and sought clean-up-cost recovery under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) from Apollo Metals Inc., Congoleum Corporations, Gould Inc., and Sandvik Inc. (the generators) (defendants). The government claimed that the generators had produced waste that contaminated the Wade site because it was found that the generators had disposed of waste at the Wade site and that hazardous substances like those found in the generator’s waste were present at the site. The generators argued that the government must show that the generators’ actual waste was present at the site and had been the subject of a removal or remediation measure before they could be liable for clean-up costs. The generators also argued that, according to the original House Committee bill for CERCLA, the government must prove a causal relationship between their wastes and the costs incurred by the government in cleaning up the site as required by CERCLA and the doctrine of proximate cause.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Newcomer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership