United States v. Walters

775 Fed. Appx. 25 (2019)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Walters

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
775 Fed. Appx. 25 (2019)

  • Written by Noah Lewis, JD

Facts

Jaquan Walters (defendant) provided Lamar Moorer with a $10 bag of marijuana, but Moorer refused to pay. Moorer punched Walters, and Walters continued the fight, which ended after several minutes. Walters left on his bicycle and retrieved a loaded gun from the roof of a nearby building. Six minutes after the fight ended, Walters returned to the scene. Moorer was unarmed and talking on his cellphone. Walters slowly and purposely pulled the gun out and shot Moorer execution style, firing at least five shots in Moorer’s chest at point-blank range, continuing to shoot even after Moorer had fallen on the ground. Walters was convicted of distributing and possessing with intent to distribute marijuana and of murdering another person with a firearm in relation to drug trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(j)(1). A bench trial took place to determine whether the killing was murder or manslaughter, i.e., whether Walters acted with malice aforethought. The district court found there was malice aforethought and sentenced Walters to 25 years’ imprisonment. Walters appealed, arguing that the government had not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the killing was committed with the state of mind necessary for murder.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership