United States v. Weintraub

613 F.2d 612 (1979)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Weintraub

United States District Court for the Sixth Circuit
613 F.2d 612 (1979)

Facts

On May 2, 1963, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) assessed taxes against Frank Andrews. The next day, the IRS served Morris Weintraub (defendant) with a notice of levy pursuant to Internal Revenue Code (code) § 6332 on any Andrews property or property right in Weintraub’s possession, based on the IRS’s belief that Weintraub owed a debt to Andrews. In August, Weintraub responded that he did not possess Andrews’s property or property rights. In September 1965, Weintraub was acquitted of criminal charges of willfully failing to honor the Andrews levy and making false statements to the IRS. The IRS attempted to collect the tax debt from Andrews until 1976, when the United States sued Weintraub pursuant to § 6332(c) for failing to honor the Andrews levy. The jury ruled for the United States. Weintraub appealed, contending that the United States’ suit was barred by the equitable doctrine of laches and the statute of limitations. Regarding laches, Weintraub claimed that he was prejudiced by the loss of documents and the death of key witnesses. Regarding the statute of limitations, Weintraub cited code § 6502, which at the time required the IRS to attempt to collect a tax within six years of assessing the tax. The United States responded that under the doctrine of nullus tempus occurrit regi (nullus tempus) (1) it was categorically not subject to laches and (2) § 6502 was inapplicable to § 6332.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Celebrezze, J.)

Concurrence (Keith, J.)

Dissent (Merritt, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership