V.A. v. San Pasqual Valley Unified School District
United States District Court for the Southern District of California
2017 WL 6541447 (2017)
- Written by Ann Wooster, JD
Facts
A public-high-school athlete (plaintiff) on the varsity football and basketball teams began to kneel silently during the playing or singing of the national anthem at athletic events. The athlete stated that he wanted to express his personal feelings about racial injustice in the country. After an away football game at which the athlete chose to kneel silently during the national anthem, an incident took place involving students from the opposing high school, who approached the athlete and his classmates, made racial comments and threats, and sprayed water on them. The athlete’s principal spoke with the athlete’s mother and stated that failing to stand during the national anthem could be seen as disrespectful to the opposing high school. The superintendent of the San Pasqual Valley Unified School District (school district) (defendant), where the athlete attended school, issued a policy memorandum to the school district’s coaching staff, ordering students and coaches to stand during the national anthem. The school-district board of trustees asked the school district’s counsel to draft a facilities-use policy disallowing political activism or peaceful political protest during the national anthem by kneeling or sitting. The athlete brought an action in the district court and argued that the school district’s policies violated his free-speech rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The athlete sought a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to prevent enforcement of these policies by the school district.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bashant, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.