Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

Valdes v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
475 F.3d 1319 (2007)


Facts

William Blake was a paid Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) informant who was introduced to Nelson Valdes (defendant), a District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department detective. Blake was introduced to Valdes as a judge. Valdes gave Blake his business card and cell phone number and told Blake to call him if Blake ever needed a favor. The FBI instructed Blake to see if Valdes would give Blake police information. After the FBI entered five fake names, with fake addresses and license plate numbers, into a law-enforcement database, Blake asked Valdes if he would look up information on a few individuals who purportedly owed Blake money. Valdes agreed, and Blake gave Valdes $50. Valdes searched for the fictitious individual in the police database and provided the information to Blake over the phone. When Blake asked what he owed Valdes, Valdes replied “just a thank you.” Blake soon contacted Valdes again to request another search but proposed meeting in person to exchange the information. Unbeknownst to Valdes, Blake and the FBI wanted the meeting to be in person so that Blake could offer him money for the information. Over the next week, Blake and Valdes met twice. Blake gave Valdes $200 at each meeting, and Valdes completed four more searches in the police database for Blake. Valdes was indicted on three counts of bribery under 18 U.S.C. § 201(b)(2)(A) and (C). He was convicted of three counts of the lesser included offense of accepting an illegal gratuity under 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(1)(B). Valdes appealed, alleging that the evidence was insufficient to show that his database searches or giving the information to Blake amounted to an official act as required by the statute.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Williams, J.)

Concurrence (Kavanaugh, J.)

Dissent (Garland, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial