Valente v. PepsiCo, Inc.
United States District Court for the District of Delaware
68 F.R.D. 361 (1975)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
PepsiCo, Inc. (Pepsi) (defendant) owned 74 percent of Wilson Sporting Goods Company (Wilson). Certain of Pepsi’s officers sat on Wilson’s board of directors. Pepsi merged with Wilson. Elizabeth Valente and other minority shareholders of Wilson (collectively, Valente) (plaintiffs) sued Pepsi, claiming that Pepsi and its officers violated securities laws in their communications and offer to Wilson shareholders. Valente moved to compel production of certain documents prepared by Pepsi’s counsel addressing the tax consequences of different forms that the merger with Wilson might take. Pepsi asserted that the documents were not discoverable due to the attorney-client privilege.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wright, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.