Valentine v. Valentine
Ohio Court of Appeals
2005 WL 1131748 (2005)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Ann Valentine (plaintiff) and Charles Valentine (defendant) were married in 1996 and divorced in 2003. The couple had two children. The divorce decree named Ann the sole residential parent and granted parenting time to Charles. Ann was required to make the children available for and encourage the children’s participation in telephone calls with Charles on a weekly basis. The divorce proceedings were contentious, and the two could not cooperate on anything. On October 8 and 15, 2003, Ann failed to make the children available for their one-hour call with Charles. In light of Ann’s failure, Charles requested modification orders. In response, Ann filed her own request to relocate the children from Ohio to New Jersey. The children had a set schedule in Ohio, were adjusted to their living environment, and maintained relationships with both parents. Ann testified that a move to New Jersey would be beneficial for the children and allow her to feel safer because she could be free from Charles’s “stalking” behavior. Charles testified that Ann’s move to New Jersey would effectively terminate his relationship with the children and that he believed her move was designed to interfere with his ability to see the children. The court found Ann in contempt for failing to accommodate Charles’s phone contact. Moreover, the court found a change in circumstances in that Ann’s proposed move would harm the children and not be in their best interests. Accordingly, the court ordered the children to remain in Ohio until further notice. Ann appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Walsh, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.