Valentino v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.

97 F.3d 1227 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Valentino v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
97 F.3d 1227 (1996)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Carter-Wallace, Inc., and Wallace Laboratories (collectively, Carter-Wallace) (defendants) manufactured Felbatol, a drug used to treat epilepsy. Carter-Wallace marketed Felbatol without serious-side-effect warnings and subsequently learned that some patients had developed aplastic anemia and liver failure. Monica Valentino and others (collectively, Valentino) (plaintiffs) brought a products-liability class action against Carter-Wallace. The district court conditionally certified a plaintiff class consisting of all persons who began using Felbatol before Carter-Wallace notified the physician community of the risk of aplastic anemia and a “serious injury” subclass, and it limited class certification to certain issues. Carter-Wallace appealed, arguing that the certified class did not meet Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Rule) 23(b)(3)’s requirements that common issues of fact predominate over individual issues and a class action be superior to other adjudication methods. Carter-Wallace maintained that In re Northern Dist. of California, Dalkon Shield IUD Prod. Liab. Litig. barred class certification for multistate plaintiffs asserting personal-injury claims against manufacturers of drugs and medical devices.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Schroeder, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership