Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Valley Bank of Ronan v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Montana
147 P.3d 185 (2006)


Facts

Charles Hughes (defendant), the victim of a scam, deposited two official checks and two personal checks totaling more than $1,000,000 into Hughes’s accounts at Valley Bank of Ronan (Valley Bank) (plaintiff). Hughes asked Valley Bank to verify the validity of the official checks before depositing the checks. A Valley Bank official told Hughes that the official checks were just like cashier’s checks and did not need to be verified. The checks were deposited, and Valley Bank, at Hughes’s request, wired $800,000 to a foreign account. Those funds were withdrawn and were never recovered. When Valley Bank later discovered that the checks were counterfeit, Valley Bank exercised its right to charge back Hughes’s account for the $800,000. Hughes deposited a portion of this amount with Valley Bank and executed a secured promissory note for the remainder. Hughes failed to pay the promissory note, and Valley Bank brought a foreclosure action against Hughes. Hughes counterclaimed, asserting negligent misrepresentation based on Valley Bank’s statements about its check-settlement process, and various other common-law and equitable claims. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Valley Bank, finding that Valley Bank had not violated its duty of ordinary care under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) in processing the checks. Hughes appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rice, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 178,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.