Valley Die Cast Corp. v. A.C.W. Inc.
Michigan Court of Appeals
181 N.W.2d 303 (1970)
- Written by Tom Syverson, JD
Facts
Paul Stafford wanted to start a car-wash business. Stafford organized a corporation called A.C.W. Inc. (ACW) (defendant) and purchased car-wash equipment from Valley Die Cast Corp. (Valley) (plaintiff). In July 1966, ACW put a down payment on the equipment and executed a note with Valley for the remaining balance. ACW used the equipment for a few months and made five payments on the note. ACW then informed Valley that the equipment was defective. In January 1967, due to Valley’s breach of warranties, ACW asked Valley to remove the equipment and refund ACW’s payments. Valley did not remove the equipment or refund ACW’s payments. ACW continued using the equipment until May 1967, when ACW purchased new equipment. ACW had to renovate the car-wash building to accommodate the replacement equipment. ACW told Valley that ACW would be moving the old equipment into storage, except for a boiler, pump, and sign. ACW retained use of those three items. Valley sued ACW for the balance due on the note, and ACW counterclaimed for breach of warranty and fraud. The jury entered judgment in favor of ACW and awarded damages. Both parties appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Holbrook, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.