Van de Perre v. Edwards

[2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014 (2001)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Van de Perre v. Edwards

Canada Supreme Court
[2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014 (2001)

Facts

Kimberly Van de Perre (plaintiff) was a Caucasian Canadian who lived in Vancouver. Theodore Edwards (defendant) was an African American who played basketball for the Vancouver team in the National Basketball Association. Edwards was married with children, and his family resided in North Carolina. Van de Perre and Edwards met in Vancouver and began a relationship, and Van de Perre became pregnant with Edwards’s son, Elijah. Van de Perre sought child support and custody of Elijah in a trial court in British Columbia. At trial, counsel for Van de Perre and Edwards were reluctant to raise the issue of Elijah’s race because counsel considered the topic to be taboo. There was no evidence or argument relating to Elijah’s racial identity, Van de Perre or Edwards’s racial awareness, or race relations in Vancouver or North Carolina. Race was obliquely mentioned in terms of Elijah’s heritage, but neither Van de Perre nor Edwards emphasized the issue. Race was not an enumerated factor in the jurisdiction’s best-interests-of-the-child analysis. The trial court noted that the issue of race was not determinative and that it was important for Elijah to be familiar with his African American and Caucasian Canadian heritage. The trial court held that the overriding factor was that Van de Perre would provide a more stable, loving home. The trial court awarded custody to Van de Perre, with parenting time to Edwards. Edwards appealed to the British Columbia Court of Appeal. The appellate court reversed the trial court, holding that the trial court improperly disregarded the issue of race. Examining all the evidence anew, the appellate court concluded that because Elijah would be viewed as African American, he should be raised by his African American family, and Elijah’s best interests were served in Edwards’s custody. Van de Perre appealed to the Canada Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bastarache, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership