Van Den Broeke v. Bellanca Aircraft Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
576 F.2d 582 (1978)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Ed Van Den Broeke (plaintiff) bought an airplane from Bellanca Aircraft Corporation (Bellanca) (defendant) to use as a crop duster, based on advertisements from Bellanca representing that use for the airplane. When the plane was later delivered, a warranty certificate was also delivered. Bellanca also provided Broeke with a postcard that was to be returned to Bellanca for the purpose of notifying Bellanca of the purchase and activating the warranties. Broeke returned the postcard to Bellanca. The written warranty expressly disclaimed any implied warranties and precluded recovery for consequential damages or negligence. The postcard that Broeke returned to Bellanca did not contain the warranty disclaimer or incorporate the disclaimer by reference. Broeke experienced mechanical problems with the plane and suffered business losses as a result. Broeke sued Bellanca, alleging breach of the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness of purpose and negligence in design. The district court granted Bellanca’s motion for summary judgment, finding that the express disclaimers of warranty precluded Broeke’s claims. Broeke appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Morgan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.