Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Van-Go Transport Co., Inc. v. New York City Board of Education

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
971 F.Supp. 90 (1997)


Facts

Van-Go Transport Co., Inc. (Van-Go), Sterling Coach (Sterling), and Celebrity Transit (Celebrity) (together, the companies) were businesses that provided bus and van transportation. The two principals of the companies were Paul and Isaac Dachs (Dachs). Sterling and Celebrity submitted proposals for a contract with the New York City Board of Education (the board). The board did not award the contract to Sterling or Celebrity. In a letter to Sterling and Celebrity, the board cited the possibility of criminal activity, specifically, the offering of gratuities to government officials. A business submitting certain types of bids to the city was required to use the city’s computerized Vendex system, and to submit a completed Vendex questionnaire with its bid. Part of the questionnaire asks whether the bidder had previously been the subject of an investigation. In a later bid submitted through the Vendex system, Celebrity and Dachs were required to disclose that their previous proposal was denied because of the board’s unsubstantiated allegations of offering gratuities to government officials. This information was placed in the data files for all three companies and Dachs. The companies and Dachs (plaintiffs) brought a defamation action against the board (defendant). The board moved for summary judgment on the defamation claim, arguing that the defamatory action was barred because the companies and Dachs placed the defamatory statements into the Vendex system themselves.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Trager, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.