Vanadium Corp. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
159 F.2d 105 (1947)
- Written by Matt Fyock, JD
Facts
The case involved two tracts of land held as mining leases by Redington (defendant), Wade, and Curran. Redington and Vanadium Corp. (Vanadium) (plaintiff) entered into a contract whereby Redington assigned to Vanadium his interest in the two leases, subject to approval by the Secretary of Interior. The contract provided that if the assignments were not approved, the agreement would be cancelled and Redington would refund the purchase price. Redington apparently failed to provide assurances to the Department of the Interior that it intended to cooperate with Wade and Curran in operating the leaseholds, and the Department eventually declined to approve the assignments. Vanadium brought suit to recover the purchase price. Redington was the principle on the bond issued by Fidelity & Deposit. The jury found for Redington. Vanadium appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clark, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 788,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.