Vance v. Terrazas
United States Supreme Court
444 U.S. 252, 100 S.Ct. 540, 62 L.Ed.2d 461 (1980)
- Written by Christopher Bova, JD
Facts
Laurence Terrazas (plaintiff) was born in the United States to a Mexican citizen. While a student in Mexico, he applied for and received a certificate of Mexican nationality. To obtain this certificate, he had to swear an oath of obedience and submission to the Mexican Republic, and expressly renounce his United States citizenship. After discussions with an officer of the U.S. Consulate in Monterrey, the Department of State issued a certificate of loss of nationality. Terrazas then brought suit in district court against the Secretary of State for a declaration of his United States citizenship. The trial court found that the government had proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Terrazas had voluntarily relinquished his United States citizenship. The court of appeals reversed, holding that under Afroyim v. Rusk, 387 U.S. 253 (1967), that Congress had no power to legislate the evidentiary standard and that the Constitution required clear and convincing evidence. The Supreme Court granted certiorari on the Secretary’s appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J)
Concurrence/Dissent (Marshall, J)
Concurrence/Dissent (Stevens, J)
Dissent (Brennan, J)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.