From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Vance v. Wolfe
Colorado Supreme Court
205 P.3d 1165 (Colo. 2009)
Colorado water wells drilled outside of a designated ground water basin were required to be permitted. Colorado law defined a “well” as “any structure or device used for the purpose or with the effect of obtaining ground water for a beneficial use from an aquifer.” In turn, Colorado law defined “beneficial use” as “the use of that amount of water that is reasonable and appropriate under reasonably efficient practices to accomplish without waste the purpose for which the appropriation is lawfully made.” William Vance and others (the ranchers) (plaintiffs) possessed senior riparian water rights on local water subject to the jurisdiction of the Colorado State Engineer and Division Engineer for Water Division 7 (the engineers) (defendants). Oil and gas companies in the region produced coalbed methane (CBM), a process for which water is necessary. The engineers did not require the oil and gas companies to obtain permits for their CBM wells. The ranchers brought suit in the Colorado District Court, Water Division 7, seeking a declaratory judgment that the use of water in the CBM production process was a beneficial use, requiring the CBM wells to be permitted by the engineers. The engineers argued that the use of water during the production of CBM constituted a nuisance, rather than a beneficial use, because the water was an “unwanted byproduct” of the CBM process. The water court granted the ranchers summary judgment, finding that the use of water during the production of CBM was a beneficial use, and that it required a water well permit. The engineers appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Eid, J.)
Dissent (Coats, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 516,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 516,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.