Vandenberg v. Superior Court

982 P.2d 229 (1999)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Vandenberg v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court
982 P.2d 229 (1999)

EP

Facts

Eugene and Kathryn Boyd (plaintiffs) leased an automobile dealership to John Vandenberg (defendant). When the lease ended, the Boyds discovered underground tanks that contaminated the groundwater. The Boyds sued Vandenberg. Vandenberg’s commercial general-liability insurance was through Centennial Insurance Company (Centennial) and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF&G) (collectively, insurers). The policies contained exclusions for contamination except if contamination occurred suddenly and accidentally. USF&G agreed to defend, with coverage and indemnification to be determined later. Vandenberg, the Boyds, and USF&G settled all claims with the exception of the claim that contamination breached the lease agreement, which was to be resolved between Vandenberg and the Boyds at arbitration. The Boyds prevailed at the arbitration. The arbitrator reasoned that contamination was from Vandenberg’s improper tank installation and maintenance and did not occur suddenly or accidentally. The award was confirmed by the superior court and reduced to a judgment. The insurers denied coverage and indemnification. Vandenberg filed a coverage lawsuit against the insurers, who moved to dismiss, arguing that the arbitration award triggered the policy’s exclusion and that the issue was thus precluded from being relitigated under collateral estoppel. The trial court granted the motion, which was reversed on appeal. The court of appeal held that the issue could be litigated because it arose in a separate case and claim and against a different party. The insurers appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Baxter, J.)

Dissent (Brown, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership