From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Vander Zee v. Karabatsos
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
89 F.2d 441 U.S. 962 (1979)
Rein J. Vander Zee (plaintiff), an attorney, referred a client, the Savage/Fogarty Company (Savage) to another attorney, Kimon T. Karabatsos (defendant). Vander Zee arranged a meeting with a representative of Savage at his club, and the following morning, Vander Zee invited Karabatsos to his home for a breakfast meeting. Vander Zee claimed that during the meeting, Karabatsos agreed to pay Vander Zee one-third of the fees he received from Savage. When Karabatsos did not pay Vander Zee, Vander Zee sued Karabatsos for breach of contract. During the trial, Vander Zee and his wife, who was a witness to the breakfast meeting, testified about the terms of the oral contract. Another witness also testified about discussions with Karabatsos about a fee-splitting arrangement with Vander Zee. Following the trial, the jury found in favor of Vander Zee, awarding him one-third of the money Karabatsos received from Savage. The trial court entered a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV), concluding there was no substantial evidence of an oral contract between Vander Zee and Karabatsos. Karabatsos had also moved for a new trial on two grounds: the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, and the jury awarded excessive damages. The court granted the motion, concluding that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence but did not discuss the issue of damages. Vander Zee appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.