Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Vanderbilt University v. DiNardo

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
174 F.3d 751 (6th Cir. 1999)


Facts

On December 3, 1990, Vanderbilt University (Vanderbilt) (plaintiff) hired Gerry DiNardo (defendant) as its head football coach for a period of five years. The employment contract stated that the five-year period was of essence to the contract and essential to the stability of Vanderbilt’s football program. Thus, the contract provided that, if DiNardo resigned from his position during the contract period and began employment for another institution, he would pay Vanderbilt liquidated damages equal to his net salary for the time remaining in his contract. Prior to the expiration of the five-year period, the parties signed an addendum extending the term of the contract by two years. On December 12, 1994, DiNardo decided to accept a coaching position at Louisiana State University (LSU). Vanderbilt demanded that DiNardo pay liquidated damages for the one remaining year under the original contract and two remaining years under the addendum. DiNardo did not pay this amount. Vanderbilt sued DiNardo for breach of contract. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The district court found the liquidated damages provision and the addendum were enforceable and entered judgment in favor of Vanderbilt. DiNardo appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Gibson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Concurrence/Dissent (Nelson, J.)

The concurrence/dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the judge’s concurrence in part and dissent in part. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.