Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Vanderbilt v. Vanderbilt

United States Supreme Court
354 U.S. 416 (1957)


Facts

While living in California, Patricia Vanderbilt (plaintiff) and Cornelius Vanderbilt (defendant) separated after four years of marriage. Thereafter, Patricia moved to New York. Cornelius filed a petition against Patricia for divorce in Nevada. The Nevada court issued a final divorce decree. However, Patricia was never served with process in Nevada, did not know about the divorce petition, and did not personally appear in the Nevada court. The following year, Patricia filed a petition for separation and alimony against Cornelius in New York. Although the New York court did not have personal jurisdiction over Cornelius, the court sequestered property owned by Cornelius within New York in order to satisfy his financial obligations to Patricia. Cornelius appeared at a subsequent hearing on Patricia’s petition and claimed that the Full Faith and Credit Clause compelled the New York court to enforce the Nevada divorce decree. The New York court agreed, concluding that the marriage had been dissolved, but nonetheless entered an order directing Cornelius to make designated alimony payments to Patricia. Cornelius appealed. The New York Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.