Vandergriff v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
125 P.3d 360 (2005)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Over a three-month period, Norman Vandergriff (defendant) burglarized two cabins in Petersburg, Alaska. Vandergriff stole two boats, three firearms, and an outboard motor. Vandergriff also forged a check that was payable to himself and contained the purported signature of one of the homeowners. Vandergriff was indicted by a grand jury on nine felony counts. The state and Vandergriff entered an agreement under which Vandergriff agreed to plead to: (1) second-degree forgery, (2) second-degree burglary, and (3) second-degree theft. Because the agreement did not establish a sentence to be imposed, the trial judge determined the appropriate sentence. The presumptive term for each of the three offenses was three years, because Vandergriff had multiple prior felony convictions for other property offenses. The maximum term permitted for each individual offense was five years. The trial judge sentenced Vandergriff to three consecutive three-year terms, with three years suspended. Vandergriff was to serve a total of six years. Vandergriff appealed on the ground that the trial judge erred in assigning consecutive sentences that totaled more than the presumptive term for Vandergriff’s most serious offense.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stewart, J.)
Concurrence (Mannheimer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.