From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Vanegas v. American Energy Services
Supreme Court of Texas
302 S.W.3d 299 (2009)
Vanegas and several other employees (the employees) (plaintiffs) worked as at-will employees for American Energy Services (AES) (defendant). An AES representative orally promised the employees that if AES was sold or merged with another company, the employees who were still employed at AES would together receive five percent of the value of the sale or merger. AES was sold, but the company refused to pay the remaining employees their proceeds from the sale. The employees who were still employed at AES sued for breach of an oral contract. AES moved for summary judgment, arguing that the agreement to pay the employees was illusory. The trial court granted summary judgment for AES, and the court of appeals affirmed. The employees appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Green, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.