Vasquez v. Hawthorne
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc
33 P.3d 735 (2001)
Frank Vasquez (plaintiff) lived with Robert Schwerzler for approximately 26 years. They also worked in a business together. According to Vasquez, the men were lifetime romantic and business partners who shared their household and assets. That said, the house the men lived in, two automobiles, a life insurance policy, and a checking account were all held in Schwerzler’s name. When he died without a will, Vasquez filed a claim against his estate for a share of community property. The representative of the estate, Joseph Hawthorne (defendant), denied the claim. Vasquez filed suit against Hawthorne, asserting equitable theories including meretricious relationship, implied partnership, and equitable trust. Hawthorne defended the estate with evidence that Vasquez and Schwerzler maintained separate bedrooms and took separate vacations, and that the business was inherited by Schwerzler with Vasquez serving merely as a handyman. The trial court granted partial summary judgment to Vasquez on the meretricious relationship claim. The court of appeals reversed on the grounds that the meretricious relationship doctrine applies only to opposite-sex couples. Vasquez appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.