Vasquez v. Sund Emba AB

548 N.Y.S.2d 728 (1989)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Vasquez v. Sund Emba AB

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
548 N.Y.S.2d 728 (1989)

Facts

Edwin Vasquez (plaintiff) was allegedly injured by a box-folding machine manufactured by Sund Emba AB (Sund) (defendant), a multinational corporation based in Sweden. Vasquez filed suit against Sund and served it with a summons and complaint that was written in English only. In accordance with the service methods prescribed by the Hague Service Convention, the summons and complaint were served by a Swedish notary public upon Sund’s managing director at its facility in Sweden. Sund moved to dismiss the case, arguing that service was improper. According to Sund, when Sweden signed the Hague Service Convention, Sweden allegedly objected to personal service of foreign documents within that country except by a central authority, specifically the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, designated by Sweden for receiving and serving such documents. Sund also contested service because the summons and complaint did not come with a Swedish translation. The court denied the motion, finding that service was proper. Sund appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rosenblatt, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership