Vassali v. Gagnaire
France Court of Cassation
Recueil Dalloz, Jurisprudence 13 (1996)
- Written by Tom Squier, JD
Facts
Vassali (plaintiff) entered into a franchise contract with Gagnaire (defendant) under which Gagnaire promised to purchase products for his franchise exclusively from Vassali for a period of five years. The contract did not set a specific price for the products to be purchased. Instead, Gagnaire promised in the contract to purchase the products at whatever price Vassali had set at the time of future orders as the catalogue price for all franchisees. Gagnaire petitioned to have the contract invalidated based on Article 1591 of the Civil Code of France, which stated that parties to a contract for the sale of goods must establish and state the price of the sale. The case made its way to a court of appeals, which held the contract to be invalid based on the fact that the contract allowed Vassali, as franchisor, to unilaterally set the price. Vassali appealed to the France Court of Cassation.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.