Vaughan v. Menlove
Court of Common Pleas
132 Eng. Rep. 490 (1837)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
Menlove (defendant) owned a stack of hay located on his property. The stack was near the property of Vaughan (plaintiff), upon which Vaughan owned two cottages. Menlove was repeatedly warned by neighbors that his haystack was a fire hazard. Menlove did not remove the stack, but instead put a chimney through it as a precaution. The haystack burst into flames which spread to Vaughan’s property and destroyed his cottages. Vaughan brought suit for damages against Menlove. At trial, the jury held for Vaughan, and Menlove appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tindal, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.