VE Holding Corp. v. Johnson Gas Appliance Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
917 F.2d 1574, 16 U.S.P.Q.2d 1614 (1990)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
VE Holding Corporation (VE) (plaintiff) brought a patent-infringement action against Johnson Gas Appliance Company (Johnson) (defendant) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Johnson, an Iowa corporation, conceded that VE had properly obtained personal jurisdiction over it in that judicial district. However, Johnson moved for dismissal on the ground of improper venue because it did not have a regular and established place of business in Northern California. This motion was in accordance with a longstanding venue provision governing patent and copyright cases, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b), which stated that venue is proper if (1) the defendant resides in the judicial district or (2) the defendant committed alleged acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business in the judicial district. The court, relying on this provision, dismissed VE’s suit. VE appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Plager, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.