United States Tax Court
8 T.C. 809 (1947)
Howard Veit (plaintiff) was the executive vice president of a cotton-goods company in 1939 and 1940. The company paid Veit a fixed salary during these years, plus a bonus of 10 percent of the company’s profits for each respective year. The company was originally obligated to pay the bonuses for both years in 1941. In 1940, Veit desired to work less, and the company agreed to restructure his working obligations. One of the bargained-for terms of Veit’s employment agreement was that the 1940 bonus payment was to be deferred until 1942. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) believed that Veit had constructively received the 1940 bonus in 1941 and that the new agreement was ineffective to delay the bonus payment for tax purposes. Veit petitioned the United States Tax Court for a redetermination.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.