Velez v. Awning Windows, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
375 F.3d 35 (2004)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Velez (plaintiff) brought an employment discrimination lawsuit against Awning Windows, Inc. (AWI) (defendant). Throughout the pre-trial phase of the proceeding, AWI repeatedly filed for extensions, missed court-imposed deadlines, and “dragged their feet from the very inception of the action.” Specifically, after Velez filed a motion for summary judgment, AWI missed its deadline for filing an opposition, got another deadline from the district court, and instead of filing its opposition on the new deadline, filed a motion for another extension. The motion merely provided reasons why the extension should be granted and otherwise did not contain the elements of a proper motion under Rule 56(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court, after being fairly lenient with AWI throughout the proceeding, disregarded AWI’s late opposition to the motion for summary judgment and took Velez’s statements of facts in the motion as true. In addition, after AWI also failed to respond to the district court’s request for a legal memorandum on a hearsay issue, the court precluded the testimony as a sanction for the failure to respond. AWI appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Selya, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 826,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 991 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.