Verlinden B.V. v. Central Bank of Nigeria
United States Supreme Court
461 U.S. 480 (1983)
The Federal Republic of Nigeria contracted with Verlinden B. V. (plaintiff), a Dutch corporation principally located in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, for 240,000 metric tons of cement. The contract required an irrevocable letter of credit payable through Slavenburg’s Bank in Amsterdam. However, the Central Bank of Nigeria (defendant), an instrumentality of the Nigerian government, executed an unconfirmed letter of credit payable through Morgan Guaranty Trust Company in New York. The cement’s delivery was delayed in the Nigerian ports, which were jammed with hundreds of other ships carrying cement from other suppliers. The Central Bank of Nigeria subsequently ordered Morgan Guaranty Trust Company to amend the letter of credit to state that payment would be made only to suppliers whose shipments were approved two months before they entered Nigerian waters. Verlinden sued the Central Bank of Nigeria in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging subject-matter jurisdiction under an exception to sovereign immunity codified in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. The district court held that a federal court has subject-matter jurisdiction to hear a suit by a foreign corporation against a foreign sovereign but nevertheless dismissed the suit, holding that the Central Bank of Nigeria, a foreign instrumentality, enjoyed sovereign immunity, and none of the act’s exceptions applied. Verlinden appealed. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed that a foreign plaintiff could sue in a US court under the act but held that dismissal was proper because suit pursuant to the act exceeded diversity and federal-question jurisdiction under Article III. Verlinden appealed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.