Verni v. Cleveland Chiropractic College
Missouri Supreme Court
212 S.W.3d 150 (2007)
- Written by Christine Hilgeman, JD
Facts
Dr. Aleksandr Makarov (defendant) was employed by Cleveland Chiropractic College (Cleveland) (defendant), where he taught a dermatology course. Leonard Verni (plaintiff), a student in Makarov’s class, sued to enforce Makarov’s employment contract with Cleveland. Verni, who had been dismissed from the school for disseminating advance copies of an exam from the dermatology course, claimed that Makarov failed to treat him with “courtesy, respect, fairness and professionalism,” as required by the faculty handbook. The handbook indicated that students were entitled to such treatment. Verni argued that, as a student, he was an intended beneficiary of the employment contract between Makarov and Cleveland. The one page employment contract explained Makarov’s duties and compensation as a professor, and stated that he must comply with the policies and procedures contained in the faculty handbook. Verni prevailed at trial and Makarov appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wolff, C.J)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
