Verni v. Harry M. Stevens, Inc.

903 A.2d 475 (2006)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Verni v. Harry M. Stevens, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
903 A.2d 475 (2006)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Visibly drunk Daniel Lanzaro (defendant) was served beer at Giants Stadium. Afterward Lanzaro went to two bars, then drove drunk and hit a car driven by Ronald Verni (defendant). Injured passengers Fazila Verni and two-year-old Antonia Verni (plaintiffs) obtained a nearly $110 million judgment against Harry M. Stevens, Inc. of New Jersey (HMS), Aramark Services Management of New Jersey, Inc. (ASM), their parent, Aramark Corporation (AC), and its overseeing subsidiaries, Aramark Sports and Entertainment Group, Inc. (ASEG) (collectively, defendants). HMS held the liquor license and concession contract for the stadium, while ASM provided employees who ran concessions. HMS had no employees, business premises, or other income, but HMS and ASM had separate officers and directors and observed corporate formalities. ASEG shared officers with other entities within the organization, including HMS and ASM. ASM used the same address as AC and provided employees exclusively to AC subsidiaries. HMS’s and ASM’s debt exceeded assets by $14 million, but no evidence showed their initial capitalization or how much capital corporations their size needed to run stadium concessions. HMS deposited concession income into a single centralized AC account used to pay receivables, but paychecks cut to employees identified the appropriate subsidiary. All the subsidiaries reported revenues and liabilities separately, and no evidence showed commingling. AC’s chief financial officer testified AC formed subsidiaries to allow operations in multiple states. The trial court nonetheless pierced the corporate veil by holding AC and ASEG liable. All four corporations appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Cuff, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership