Vernon Township Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. v. Connor

855 A.2d 873 (2004)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Vernon Township Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. v. Connor

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
855 A.2d 873 (2004)

Play video

Facts

The Vernon Township Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. (Fire Department) (plaintiff) purchased a parcel of land within the Cuthbert Subdivision for the purpose of building a social hall that would sell alcohol to its patrons. After beginning construction, the Fire Department learned of a restrictive covenant barring the sale of alcohol within the subdivision. The Fire Department sought releases of the restrictive covenant from the owners of the 77 parcels in the subdivision. The owners of 68 parcels signed releases. The owners of three parcels neither signed releases nor sought to enforce the covenant. William E. Connor and others (defendants), who owned the remaining six parcels, refused to sign releases. The Fire Department sued to quiet title and for declaratory judgment that the restrictive covenant was obsolete and invalidated because of changed conditions in the immediate neighborhood. Specifically, the Fire Department argued there were now establishments selling alcohol in within two miles of the subdivision, though not within the subdivision itself. The trial court held the restrictive covenant valid and enforceable. The superior court reversed the trial court’s judgment on the grounds of changed conditions in the immediate neighborhood. The superior court further noted that 68 of the 77 parcel owners, and all of the property owners who testified, said they had not relied upon the alcohol restriction when purchasing the property. The defendants appealed to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)

Dissent (Castille, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership