Vernon Township Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. v. Connor
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
855 A.2d 873 (2004)
- Written by Anjali Bhat, JD
Facts
The Vernon Township Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. (Fire Department) (plaintiff) purchased a parcel of land within the Cuthbert Subdivision for the purpose of building a social hall that would sell alcohol to its patrons. After beginning construction, the Fire Department learned of a restrictive covenant barring the sale of alcohol within the subdivision. The Fire Department sought releases of the restrictive covenant from the owners of the 77 parcels in the subdivision. The owners of 68 parcels signed releases. The owners of three parcels neither signed releases nor sought to enforce the covenant. William E. Connor and others (defendants), who owned the remaining six parcels, refused to sign releases. The Fire Department sued to quiet title and for declaratory judgment that the restrictive covenant was obsolete and invalidated because of changed conditions in the immediate neighborhood. Specifically, the Fire Department argued there were now establishments selling alcohol in within two miles of the subdivision, though not within the subdivision itself. The trial court held the restrictive covenant valid and enforceable. The superior court reversed the trial court’s judgment on the grounds of changed conditions in the immediate neighborhood. The superior court further noted that 68 of the 77 parcel owners, and all of the property owners who testified, said they had not relied upon the alcohol restriction when purchasing the property. The defendants appealed to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Newman, J.)
Dissent (Castille, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.