Vescovo v. New Way Enterprises

60 Cal. App. 3d 582 (1976)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Vescovo v. New Way Enterprises

California Court of Appeal
60 Cal. App. 3d 582 (1976)

Facts

Norma Jean Vescovo, her husband, Albert Vescovo, and their daughter, Frankie Renee Vescovo (the family) (plaintiffs) lived together in California. The Los Angeles Free Press (the newspaper) (defendant) published an advertisement that used Norma’s name, was sexually explicit, and listed the family’s address. Neither Norma nor anyone acting on her behalf consented to the publication of the advertisement. After the newspaper published the advertisement, the family received numerous letters soliciting sexual acts. More than 100 people also wrongfully entered the family’s property without consent. The family sued for, among other things, invasion of privacy. The complaint included claims solely on behalf of Frankie. Specifically, the complaint claimed that Frankie was harassed by the individuals coming into the home and was subjected to ridicule by friends and neighbors, which caused her damage. The newspaper moved to dismiss, which the court denied except as to Frankie’s invasion-of-privacy claims. The trial court reasoned that Frankie had no relational privacy rights in her mother’s right to privacy. The family appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ashby, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership