VFLA Eventco, LLC v. William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC
California Court of Appeal
100 Cal.App.5th 287, 318 Cal.Rptr.3d 844 (2024)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
VFLA Eventco, LLC (VFLA) (plaintiff) planned a music festival and paid $6 million in deposits to William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC, and others (collectively, WME) (defendants) as the agents of Ellie Goulding, Kali Uchis, and Lizzo (the artists). The deposit secured the artists performing at the festival. As a result of COVID-19, VFLA canceled the festival. WME refused to refund the deposit, citing the force-majeure clause in its contract with VFLA. The clause’s first sentence defined force majeure as an event beyond the parties’ control that made performance “impossible, infeasible, or unsafe.” The second sentence excused performance if a force-majeure cancellation occurred. The third sentence contained an exception to the second sentence, stating that “if the Artist is otherwise ready, willing, and able to perform,” VFLA would pay WME. The third sentence also contained an exception to that exception, stating that VFLA would not pay WME if the cancellation was due to the artist’s death, illness, or injury. WME argued that the clause meant that if the artists were ready, willing, and able to perform but for the pandemic, it could keep the deposit. VFLA argued that the clause meant that the artists had to be ready, willing, and able to perform in spite of the pandemic for the exception to apply. VFLA sued WME for breach of contract. The trial court granted WME summary judgment. VFLA appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Viramontes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 949,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,004 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
