Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.

United States District Court for the District of Maryland
250 F.R.D. 251 (D. Md. 2008)


Facts

Victor Stanley, Inc. (VSI) (plaintiff) sued Creative Pipe, Inc. (CPI) and Mark and Stephanie Pappas (defendants). VSI sought production of electronically stored information (ESI) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 34. The trial court ordered VSI and the defendants to have their computer forensic experts consult and develop a joint protocol by which the defendants would search for and retrieve the requested ESI. The joint protocol included about five pages of keyword and phrase search terms, along with the instructions for search and retrieval. The defendants’ attorney indicated that privilege review of each document would be unduly burdensome and thus provided a list of keywords to search for privileged documents amongst the documents to be produced. However, during review of the documents produced, VSI’s attorneys discovered 165 documents potentially subject to attorney-client privilege or work product protection. VSI’s attorneys notified the defendants. VSI moved for a ruling that the ESI is discoverable, because the defendants waived any privilege or protection. The defendants did not provide the court with: the keywords searched; why they were selected; the qualifications of those who selected the search and retrieval methodology; the type of search, such as plain keyword or Boolean search; whether results were analyzed to test the methodology, its reliability, and its appropriateness; or the quality of the search itself in response.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Grimm, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 250,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.