Vieth v. Jubelirer
United States Supreme Court
541 U.S. 267 (2004)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
Vieth (plaintiff), a Pennsylvania registered Democrat, brought suit against Jubelirer (defendant) in his official capacity, alleging that the Pennsylvania General Assembly engaged in unconstitutional political gerrymandering when it established the districts for the election of congressional representatives. The complaint alleged that after the 2000 census, Pennsylvania was required to decrease its amount of representatives by two. In redistricting to reflect this change, prominent members of the Republican Party pressured the General Assembly into enacting a pro-Republican redistricting plan. This plan was ultimately passed by the Pennsylvania governor as Act I. Vieth brought suit to enjoin the implementation of Act I in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)
Dissent (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (Breyer, J.)
Dissent (Souter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.