Village Commons, LLC v. Marion County Prosecutor’s Office
Indiana Court of Appeals
882 N.E.2d 210 (2008)
- Written by Bobby Jenkins, JD
Facts
The Marion County Prosecutor’s Office (MCPO) (defendant) leased the basement of a building from Village Commons, LLC, and Rynalco, Inc. (the landlord) (plaintiffs) for an office and evidence-storage space. The seven-year lease began in August 1999. The lease provided that the landlord would maintain the premises, but it limited the remedies available to the MCPO in case of breach to the right to sue for an injunction or damages. The MCPO had no right to terminate the lease or withhold rent. The property began having water leaks in 2001. Repeated leaks caused substantial damage to the premises. Further, the water issues damaged boxes of evidence. The landlord instructed the MCPO to move evidence out of problem areas. Though the landlord made repairs, it failed to fix the problem. The landlord declined to pay for mold remediation, despite possible health risks. The MCPO vacated the building in January 2003 and stopped paying rent. The landlord sued for breach. The MCPO counterclaimed for wrongful eviction. The trial court held that the exclusive-remedy provisions in the lease did not preempt the MCPO’s defenses and that the landlord had actually and constructively evicted the MCPO. The court awarded the MCPO damages, and the landlord appealed to the Indiana Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Riley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.