Village of Brown Deer v. City of Milwaukee

114 N.W.2d 493 (1962)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Village of Brown Deer v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court
114 N.W.2d 493 (1962)

Facts

Charles Evert was the president, the majority shareholder, and one of 11 members of the board of directors of the Evert Container Corporation (ECC). Evert signed an annexation petition on ECC’s behalf, and the petition included ECC’s assessed valuation. Although Evert had discussed potentially signing the petition with most of the members of ECC’s board of directors, Evert neither obtained formal authorization from the board nor obtained the unanimous written consent of the other board members and shareholders before signing the petition. Thereafter, the City of Milwaukee (Milwaukee) (defendant) challenged Evert’s authority to sign the annexation petition on ECC’s behalf. The Village of Brown Deer (plaintiff) raised a threshold question of whether Milwaukee had standing to challenge the same. During the proceedings, evidence suggested that Evert had frequently resolved ECC’s problems as the sole owner, that the board of directors did not meet often, and that ECC subsequently ratified his action of signing the petition.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gordon, J.)

Dissent (Currie, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership