Village of Logan v. Eastern New Mexico Water Utility Authority
New Mexico Court of Appeals
357 P.3d 433 (2015)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
The Village of Logan (village) (plaintiff), located in Quay County, was authorized to enact local land-use zoning regulations promoting the health and safety of village residents. Landowners needed to apply for special-use permits to use their land in ways contrary to the applicable zoning designation. Eastern New Mexico Water Utility Authority (ENMWUA) (defendant) was a state agency created by the New Mexico legislature to develop a water delivery system for the local governments within its geographic authority, including the village. ENMWUA acquired Lot 11 in the village, which was zoned residential, and applied for and received a special-use permit to build a water intake structure on Lot 11. ENMWUA then determined it needed additional space and seized neighboring Lot 12 through its statutory eminent-domain powers. ENMWUA did not apply for a special-use permit on Lot 12. The village sued ENMWUA in district court seeking an injunction and a declaratory judgment that ENMWUA was subject to the village’s zoning regulations. ENMWUA countered, arguing it was immune from the village’s zoning regulations because it was a state agency. At trial, because the village and ENMWUA were sovereign equals, the village argued that the court should apply the balancing-of-interests test. ENMWUA argued instead for the statutory-guidance test, which would ensure legislative intent was preserved. The district court applied the statutory-guidance test and held that the New Mexico legislature intended ENMWUA to be immune from the village’s zoning laws. The village appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hanisee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.