Village of Skokie v. National Socialist Party of America

373 N.E.2d 21 (1978)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Village of Skokie v. National Socialist Party of America

Illinois Supreme Court
373 N.E.2d 21 (1978)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

The National Socialist Party of America (the NSPA) (defendant) notified officials of the village of Skokie, Illinois (the village) (plaintiff) that 30 to 50 NSPA members and supporters would hold a 20-to-30-minute peaceable, public assembly in the village to protest the Skokie Park District’s requirement that the NSPA obtain insurance before using Skokie’s public parks for public assemblies. The NSPA’s letter indicated that the demonstrators would wear uniforms bearing a swastika emblem or armband and carry a banner containing a swastika emblem and signs reading, for example, “White Free Speech,” but would not distribute or say anything derogatory about any ethnic or religious group. The village filed a complaint seeking to enjoin the NSPA and 10 NSPA officers and members (collectively, the party) (defendants) from engaging in certain activities during the demonstration. The complaint alleged that the party patterned its uniform after that of the German Nazi party, that more than half of the village’s residents were Jewish and included 5,000 to 7,000 survivors of German concentration camps, and that the party was committed to inciting hatred of Jews and non-Caucasians. The circuit issued an order enjoining certain conduct during the demonstration. The appellate court modified the injunction and enjoined the party from intentionally displaying the swastika in the course of any demonstration. The Illinois Supreme Court granted the party’s petition for leave to appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership