Village Taxi Corp. v. Beltre

933 N.Y.S.2d 694 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Village Taxi Corp. v. Beltre

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division
933 N.Y.S.2d 694 (2011)

RW

Facts

The village of Port Chester licensed Village Taxi Corporation and Port Chester Taxi Corporation (plaintiffs) to operate taxicabs in the village. Ramon Beltre and Janeth Campos (the sellers) (defendants), who owned both companies, agreed to sell them to Pedro Montoya and Yodna Vivanco-Small (the buyers) (plaintiffs). The sellers and buyers also concluded a transfer agreement to switch several taxicab-operator licenses from one driver to another. Both the sellers and buyers knew that a village ordinance required official approval for all such transfers. The ordinance’s primary purpose was protecting public safety rather than raising revenue for the village. The sellers and buyers agreed to ignore the ordinance. After several drivers left the companies, the buyers and their companies sued the sellers for fraud, breach of contract, and unjust enrichment. The buyers also filed related complaints against other parties. The trial-level supreme court found the transfer agreement unenforceable and dismissed the case. The buyers appealed to the supreme court’s appellate division.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Leventhal, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership