Vincent v. Harvey Well Service

441 F.2d 146 (1971)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Vincent v. Harvey Well Service

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
441 F.2d 146 (1971)

Facts

Gabriel Vincent (plaintiff) worked on an amphibious drilling rig while employed by Harvey Well Service (Harvey Well) (defendant). Seamen on the rig worked a 12-hours-on, 24-hours-off shift schedule. The rig did not have sleeping quarters, so workers had to be taken to shore between shifts. Because of the difficultly seamen had transporting themselves to and from work between shifts, Harvey Well provided shuttle service. After each shift, a Harvey Well employee drove the workers from the pierhead to a gas station in a town approximately 50 miles away. Seamen were not required to avail themselves of the car service, but the isolated nature of the rig highly incentivized them to do so. Vincent was injured while being shuttled by the car service. Vincent sued to recover compensation under the Jones Act. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Harvey Well, and Vincent appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brown, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership