Vincent v. Harvey Well Service
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
441 F.2d 146 (1971)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Gabriel Vincent (plaintiff) worked on an amphibious drilling rig while employed by Harvey Well Service (Harvey Well) (defendant). Seamen on the rig worked a 12-hours-on, 24-hours-off shift schedule. The rig did not have sleeping quarters, so workers had to be taken to shore between shifts. Because of the difficultly seamen had transporting themselves to and from work between shifts, Harvey Well provided shuttle service. After each shift, a Harvey Well employee drove the workers from the pierhead to a gas station in a town approximately 50 miles away. Seamen were not required to avail themselves of the car service, but the isolated nature of the rig highly incentivized them to do so. Vincent was injured while being shuttled by the car service. Vincent sued to recover compensation under the Jones Act. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Harvey Well, and Vincent appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.