Vinson v. Marton & Associates
Arizona Court of Appeals
764 P.2d 736, 159 Ariz. 1 (1988)
- Written by Jose Espejo , JD
Facts
Marton & Associates (defendant) was a real estate partnership with its sole asset 238 acres of land. In November 1985, John Vinson (plaintiff) entered into a purchase agreement, signed by Larry Melcher and John Silva, to purchase the partnership’s land. At the time of purchase, Melcher held powers of attorney from a few partners. On December 2, escrow instructions were signed by a majority of the partners. The partnership agreement authorized all business to be completed by majority consent of the partners. Later, the partnership refused to convey the property to Vinson. Vinson filed a breach-of-contract suit against the partnership and individual partners, seeking specific performance of the contract. When the suit was filed, some of the original partners were deceased. The partnership agreement stated the death of a partner would not dissolve the partnership. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the partnership as to breach of contract. The trial court relied on the Uniform Partnership Act (UPA) § 9, which stated unanimous consent of the partners was needed for any act that would make it impossible to carry on the ordinary business of the partnership. The trial court reasoned that because some of the original partners were deceased, the provision of the partnership agreement that allowed a majority of the partners to conduct all business of the partnership could not be enforced upon successor partners and that if the agreement was silent, UPA controlled. Because the land was the sole asset, the sale of the property would make it impossible to carry on the ordinary business of the partnership, and the partners’ unanimous consent was required. Vinson appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kleinschmidt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.