Virginia Historic Tax Credit Fund 2001 LP v. Commissioner

639 F.3d 129 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Virginia Historic Tax Credit Fund 2001 LP v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
639 F.3d 129 (2011)

Facts

Virginia Historic Tax Credit Fund 2001 LP (plaintiff) was one of four funds (the funds) that comprised a partnership that funded historic renovation projects. The funds recruited investors to contribute capital in exchange for a specified amount of tax credits for the investors’ 2001 taxes and a limited partnership interest (generally a 0.01-percent interest). To limit risk, the funds promised to use the contributions for approved projects only and to refund the contributions if the investors did not ultimately receive the tax credits. The funds raised capital from almost 300 investors, and, within six months, the funds delivered the promised tax credits. The funds reported the contributions from the investors as nontaxable contributions to capital. However, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the Commissioner) (defendant) determined that the transactions were in fact disguised sales of the tax credits under § 707 of the Internal Revenue Code, which gives the Commissioner authority to recharacterize purported contributions to capital as sales for tax purposes. The tax court rejected the Commissioner’s characterization. The Commissioner appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Duncan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership