Virginia v. Browner

80 F.3d 869 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Virginia v. Browner

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
80 F.3d 869 (1996)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Virginia (plaintiff) sought review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) (defendant) disapproval of its air-pollution permitting structure pursuant to Title V of the Clean Air Act (CAA). One of the key requirements of Title V was that permitting decisions be subject to judicial review. Virginia’s air-pollution permitting structure allowed the permit applicant to challenge the permitting decision in court but restricted standing for third parties only to those with a substantial monetary interest. Those restrictions violated Title V. The EPA disapproved Virginia’s permitting structure, subjecting Virginia to potential CAA sanctions, including restricted federal highway funding, increased pollution-offset requirements, and having the EPA step in to set up Title V permitting in Virginia. Virginia challenged, arguing (1) Title V requirements impinged on state sovereignty; and (2) the Title V sanctions violated the Spending Clause and the Tenth Amendment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Michael, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership