Vista St. Clair, Inc. v. Landry’s Commercial Furnishings, Inc.
Oregon Court of Appeals
643 P.2d 1378 (1982)
- Written by Jayme Weber, JD
Facts
Vista St. Clair, Inc. (Vista) (plaintiff) owned an apartment building. Vista bought carpet for two floors of the building from Landry’s Commercial Furnishings, Inc. (Landry’s) (defendant) for about $8,500. Within six months of the carpet installation, however, the carpet developed a number of dark spots that looked like mud stains. The color issue was from a manufacturing defect. Vista talked to Landry’s about fixing the problem or replacing the carpet. These discussions continued for 3.5 years until Vista ultimately sued Landry’s for breach of warranty. Before the trial, Vista replaced the carpet for about $11,000. At trial, Vista’s president testified that the carpet Vista bought from Landry’s was not worth anything once it developed the discoloration. The trial court did not explicitly address the value of the defective carpet. However, the trial court ruled in favor of Vista, awarding it $2,500 in damages. Landry’s appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gillette, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.